Canada's 'Strong Borders Act': Unpacking Bill C-2's Impact on Black Communities

Canada Bill C-2_1.pdf

Download PDF • 1.38MB

Canada, often lauded for its welcoming stance on immigration and human rights, is navigating a significant shift with the introduction of Bill C-2, the "Strong Borders Act." Tabled in June 2025 by the Minister of Public Safety, this sweeping legislation is presented as a crucial step to bolster national security, combat organized crime, and enhance immigration system integrity. However, its broad provisions have ignited alarm among human rights advocates and civil society organizations, who warn of its potential for severe and disproportionate impacts on racialized communities, particularly Black Canadians and Black women.

This article dissects Bill C-2's key components and critically examines its broader implications, shining a spotlight on the unique challenges it poses for the Black community.

Understanding Bill C-2: A Multi-Faceted Legislative Shift

Bill C-2 proposes amendments across numerous existing acts, fundamentally altering Canada's approach to border management, immigration, and law enforcement. The government's stated goals include disrupting illicit drug flow, combating transnational organized crime, preventing money laundering, and streamlining the asylum process. While these objectives are presented as universal, the mechanisms to achieve them have sparked considerable debate.

Key Provisions include:

1. Amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA): This is the bill's most contentious aspect.

   • New Asylum Ineligibility Rules: The bill introduces strict time limits for asylum claims. Individuals in Canada for over a year (as temporary residents) may be barred from making a claim, regardless of changes in their home country's safety. Similarly, those entering irregularly from the U.S. would face a strict 14-day deadline to claim asylum. These rules risk denying protection to vulnerable individuals.

   • Broad Ministerial Powers: The Cabinet could gain unprecedented authority to cancel, suspend, or vary entire groups of immigration documents (e.g., visas, permits) if deemed "in the public interest." This broad and undefined power has been branded a potential "mass deportation machine."

   • Expanded Information Sharing: IRCC would be authorized to share client information more broadly with federal, provincial, and territorial partners, raising significant privacy concerns.

2. Enhanced Border Security and Law Enforcement Powers:

   • Customs and Mail Searches: The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) would gain enhanced access to facilities for export inspections, and barriers preventing police from searching mail (where authorized) would be removed.

   • Fast-tracking Controlled Substances: The Minister of Health could swiftly add chemicals (like fentanyl precursors) to controlled substances lists.

   • New Digital Surveillance Framework (SAAIA): The proposed Supporting Authorized Access to Information Act (SAAIA) would compel electronic service providers (ESPs) to facilitate law enforcement and CSIS access to information and communications. This is a significant expansion of state surveillance.

3. Combating Financial Crime:

   • Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Measures: The bill strengthens the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, increasing penalties, restricting large cash transactions, and requiring more businesses to register with FINTRAC.

   
   

Broader Implications for Canadians: Security vs. Rights

While the government frames Bill C-2 as essential for safety and system integrity, critics foresee a troubling shift:

• Erosion of Due Process: Broad discretionary powers granted to officials, especially the mass cancellation of immigration documents, could bypass individual review and appeal processes, undermining the rule of law.

• Privacy Concerns: Expanded powers for mail searches and digital data access under SAAIA represent a significant increase in state surveillance capacity, impacting all Canadians' privacy rights.

• Human Rights Breaches: Amnesty International Canada warns that the bill's stringent asylum rules could violate international refugee law, forcing vulnerable individuals into precarious situations or back into danger.

• Stigmatization: By linking immigration to serious public safety threats like fentanyl and organized crime, the bill's narrative risks stigmatizing newcomers, fostering xenophobia and increasing discrimination.

The Disproportionate Burden: Bill C-2 on Black Communities

Bill C-2's impacts will not be felt equally across the population. Due to Canada's documented history of systemic racism, legislation that increases control and enforcement often disproportionately affects racialized communities, especially Black people.

A Legacy of Systemic Racism:

Canada's immigration and justice systems have a history of anti-Black racism, including explicit racial prohibitions in past immigration acts (e.g., the 1911 Order-in-Council banning Black immigrants) and ongoing issues like racial profiling by law enforcement. Black individuals are disproportionately subject to police stops, searches, and are overrepresented in the justice system, often facing bias in decision-making and harsher outcomes. Many Black migrants are also in precarious immigration statuses, increasing their vulnerability to exploitation.

How Bill C-2 Amplifies Inequities:

• Increased Racial Profiling and Surveillance: Expanded powers for CBSA and law enforcement create more opportunities for racial profiling. Black individuals, already facing disproportionate scrutiny, may experience increased stops, interrogations, and intrusive searches at borders and within their communities. The sweeping digital surveillance powers under SAAIA could also disproportionately target and monitor Black community organizers, activists, and ordinary citizens, exacerbating existing distrust in authorities.

• Heightened Deportation Risk: The strict time limits for asylum claims disproportionately affect individuals who may have entered irregularly or require more time to navigate complex systems—a common reality for those fleeing trauma or facing language and resource barriers. Black migrants, who might struggle to access culturally competent legal aid, are at a higher risk of missing deadlines and facing swift deportation without a full hearing. The "mass cancellation" power could be wielded to target and remove entire groups, with Black communities potentially being disproportionately impacted due to existing biases in the system.

• Stigmatization and Criminalization: The bill's narrative, linking immigration to crime, fuels anti-Black racism by associating Black migrants with criminality. This can lead to increased discrimination in housing, employment, and social interactions, hindering integration and exacerbating economic instability.

Unique Threats to Black Women in Canada

The intersection of race and gender positions Black women in Canada as particularly vulnerable under Bill C-2. They face compounding challenges:

• Survivors of Gender-Based Violence (GBV): Many Black women seeking refuge have experienced GBV or trafficking. The bill's strict asylum timelines and complex processes can re-traumatize them and create insurmountable barriers to seeking protection, especially if they are hesitant to disclose experiences or fear authorities due to past biases.

• Precarious Work and Exploitation: Black women are often overrepresented in precarious, low-wage jobs, making them vulnerable to exploitation. Expanded surveillance and information sharing under Bill C-2 could make it riskier for them to report abuse, fearing deportation and loss of livelihood.

• Family Impact: Black women often bear significant caregiving responsibilities. Any policy threatening their status or increasing deportation risk directly impacts their ability to provide for their families, potentially fracturing families and leading to intergenerational distress.

• Mental Health Strain: The constant threat of deportation, precarious status, and pervasive fear of surveillance and racial profiling can severely impact Black women's mental health, leading to increased anxiety and depression, often with limited access to culturally competent support.

• Barriers to Justice and Support: Black women frequently face multiple barriers to accessing legal aid and social services due to language, lack of awareness of rights, fear of authorities, and systemic discrimination. Bill C-2's enforcement focus will likely widen this gap.

A Call for Scrutiny and Justice

Bill C-2, the "Strong Borders Act," marks a significant shift in Canada's policy. While framed as crucial for security, its broad provisions carry the potential to erode fundamental rights and disproportionately harm vulnerable populations.

For Black communities in Canada, especially Black women, the implications are particularly concerning. The bill's restrictive asylum rules, expansive ministerial powers, and increased surveillance capabilities threaten to deepen existing systemic discrimination and racial profiling. It risks creating a chilling effect where fear of deportation or discrimination prevents individuals from accessing essential services or exercising their rights.

As Bill C-2 progresses through Parliament, it is vital for Canadians to critically examine its provisions. Upholding Canada's commitment to human rights and social justice means ensuring that border security measures do not come at the cost of equity, dignity, and protection for those most in need. The "Strong Borders Act" must not become a tool for entrenching racialized inequalities, but rather an opportunity for a renewed commitment to a truly fair and equitable immigration system for all.